Pursuing an “ Export Culture ” through the Teaching of Asian Languages in Australian Schools — the Gap between Theory , Practice and Policy Prescription

In February 1994, the Coalition of Australian Governments (COAG) endorsed a report it commissioned in December 1992 on a policy prescription for the study of Asian Languages and Cultures in Australian schools. The acceptance of this report, Asian Languages and Australia's Economic Future (1994), referred to as the Rudd Report after the Chair of the Working Group, was significant. It offered a 15-year plan that aimed to produce an Asialiterate generation fluent and familiar with “export” Asian languages and cultures. In particular, students would have the opportunity to commence the study of one of four priority “export” Asian languages, namely, Korean, Japanese, Indonesian, and Chinese, in primary school. However, the Rudd Report’s emphasis on prioritising Asian languages for utilitarian reasons was opposed by those who advocated the study of European languages. This paper examines some of the assumptions about second language acquisition that the Rudd Report made and argues that greater emphasis should have been placed on addressing those theoretical and pedagogical issues significant to LOTE teaching in Australia. © 2002 The Asian Studies Association of Australia (ASAA) 2 HENDERSON (June 2002) ASIAN LANGUAGES IN AUST. SCHOOLS